This is default featured slide 1 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured slide 2 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured slide 3 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured slide 4 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured slide 5 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

Tampilkan postingan dengan label social security. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label social security. Tampilkan semua postingan

Sabtu, 13 September 2025

Retirees Are More Likely To Run Out Of Money If They Make These Mistakes

Getting to retirement is a lifelong journey. Not only is there a logistical wait involved in aging into this phase of modern living, but there's the integral financial elements to consider, too. No one arrives at a stable retirement without planning and working toward this goal, often for most if not all of their working life. The money management aspect of retirement is more important than most will want to admit. Relaxing and enjoying the days to their fullest without having to worry about paying the bills or getting to work on time is the goal for plenty, but the reality is that your retirement lifestyle will likely determine its success .

The value of saving with the help of a Roth IRA and other tax-advantaged retirement investment vehicles is well-established. If you don't save enough to support yourself, leaving the working life behind can be tricky if not impossible. There's no getting around this barrier to entry, but the work isn't done once you hit your targets and submit your paperwork to start drawing Social Security checks . Mistakes made early on are often far more visible, and therefore they can be easier to address and correct. After you retire, there remain pitfalls and setback opportunities that can spell disaster for your finances, too. These are some of the most important mistakes that workers and retirees alike will need to plan around if they want to avoid the potential nightmare scenario of running out of money to continue funding their life after working.

Read more: 12 Items Retirees Will Instantly Regret Buying

Retiring early

The first and perhaps most obvious problem that retirees run into involves retiring too early. The reality is that there's no singular, correct way to plan for retirement, or a guide for when to retire. Of course, in more broad strokes it might be said that you should retire when you are financially capable. But what that means will be unique for everyone. Even so, some workers might consider full retirement age to be a guiding light. In the United States that age is 67, although it's been inching up toward that figure based on birth year for over a decade and could change again in the future. Another important age is 62. When you hit this mark you can start drawing Social Security benefits, but this will come at a reduced rate, pegged at 70% of your full benefit amount. Just because you can start drawing these monthly retirement income checks doesn't mean you should though. You might also consider waiting to increase their value .

In another way, the median income today for an American worker is approximately $62,000. Experts suggest that to retire comfortably, you need about 75% of your pre-retirement income. With Social Security checks covering up to 40% of this amount, this leaves an annual gap of nearly $22,000 (at minimum) that your savings will have to cover — $1,800 per month. At a 5% withdrawal rate, this means you would need at least $434,000 in your retirement account to support the math in this example.

Banking on retiring as late as possible or continuing to work during retirement

On the opposite end of the spectrum, it's also possible to get your retirement planning wrong by anticipating additional working years or the availability of part-time work that suits your schedule and experience. Some planners will seek to remain in the workforce for as long as possible. But banking on your ability to continue working, especially if you ply your trade in a physically demanding workspace like construction or fishing, can leave you in a tough spot when you begin to get older. Those in manufacturing, agricultural fields, and many other job areas that require physical strength and performance become increasingly challenging as you age. No matter the work you do, it can be worthwhile to delay your retirement for a few additional years in order to put off the time at which your investment portfolio needs to kick in to support you financially. But failing to allow yourself some wiggle room can make for numerous hard years of work after your mind and body are ready for a rest.

Having the option to delay your retirement is a great way to supercharge your finances, but needing to stay working can have disastrous implications. Another problem area comes in the form of a necessity to keep working in a part-time role. It's true that leaving the workforce is a far more intense mental challenge than most will expect, and working part time can help ease this transition. But assuming you'll be able to find work is yet another stumbling block waiting to trip you up.

Waiting to start saving for retirement

Saving for retirement isn't something you can put off. The The best time to begin this habit is in your 20s . However, even if you haven't, it's never too late to start. Saving for retirement is something that benefits you exponentially with the value of time and compounding interest on your side. There are no guarantees in this life, but the market has set a century-long precedent in which value continues to increase as time progresses. The market as a whole has expanded significantly since its creation, and even when accounting for inflation the S&P 500 exhibits an annualized return of roughly 6.5%.

The longer you wait, the more opportunity you miss out on to take advantage of long term growth. The reality is that it doesn't take fancy footwork or killer investment strategies to grow a sizable nest egg that can support you in retirement. The only thing you need to do is invest consistently and place your money in growth assets. ETFs do a fantastic job of evening out the risk and reward landscape. They're boring, and they'll bring you exactly what you need as long as you continue prioritizing your savings and leave the strategy to do its work. Invest early and continue to set money aside for your entire career, and there's a good chance that your money can actually outlive you.

Spending too much on your adult children

Many parents want to support their children, even after they've left the nest. This urge to support loved ones is powerful and natural. On the whole, there's nothing wrong with offering a helping hand whenever you can and want to. But the key here is ability. Retirees live on a fixed income. They don't have the ability to shrink certain discretionary spending areas or seek out a new job to increase their salary figure. Of course, a retiree has the ability to draw out additional capital from their investment portfolio to cover large expenses, but this is a slippery slope that can quickly decimate its long term stability. Sometimes this is unavoidable. If you need cash to pay for medical expenses or have to foot the bill for unexpected home repairs on your own, this may be the best approach. But paying for something to support your adult children doesn't really fall under that category.

Ransacking your retirement portfolio in order to help one of your children pay for something they want can ultimately leave you in an increasingly vulnerable financial position. It's also worth noting that adult children shouldn't count on retired parents to support big-ticket items. If you do want to offer help, this support should only come when it won't fundamentally alter your financial status in a negative way. For many, these kinds of helping hands can backfire and deliver long-term instability that is difficult if not impossible to recover from.

Shifting too aggressively out of growth assets

As you age, it's important to reevaluate your portfolio balance and move away from riskier investments. As you approach retirement, your portfolio should focus on strategies for protecting principal rather than aggressive growth. The time to grow your portfolio is during your younger years, and when the time comes for this priority to shift and you begin withdrawing money from it, you'll need to focus on preventing these assets from losing value or fluctuating. Growth-oriented investments can be volatile, and a sudden drop in value in the short term is a far more dangerous situation for a retired person than for a 30-year-old who is still decades away from this change in lifestyle.

However, growth assets still occupy an important position in a retired investor's outlook. Someone seeking to totally eradicate volatility from their portfolio might withdraw everything and place it in bonds or a savings account to protect the investment from stock market movements. But this fails to take into consideration the reality that your portfolio still needs to grow, albeit at a modest pace, in order to keep up with inflation, among other financial realities.

Forgetting about tax implications

Tax implications follow consumers around wherever they go. When you buy something in a store, you have to pay sales tax; and when you withdraw funds from investment accounts, there's a tax implication to be considered here, too. Throughout your savings journey, it's critically important to keep focused on the tax liabilities surrounding any strategy you utilize. Many savers pour money into their 401(k) account in order to take advantage of employer match opportunities . This is free money that can supercharge your ability to save for retirement. But your 401(k) account uses pre-tax dollars. This means that when you withdraw funds from the account you'll pay tax on the distributions as if they were regular income. On the other hand, your Roth IRA account is funded with post-tax money. The government treats distributions from a Roth as if the entire sum of money was always yours, even if you have somehow miraculously turned a single dollar into a gigantic portfolio and almost none of the value was actually deposited by you.

This leads retirees to an important crossroads. Withdrawing money from accounts that you'll need to pay tax on leads to additional costs later in life. More importantly, the more you withdraw from these kinds of accounts, the more tax you'll pay as you move up through the tax brackets. In order to minimize your liability, utilizing a blend of accounts is typically in your best interest. This allows you to take advantage of the perks of each sort of investment vehicle while mixing and matching distributions later on to actively manage your tax liability.

Carrying debts into retirement

It's critically important to discharge every debt you can before you stop drawing your paycheck. This isn't always going to be the case, and sometimes you may consider moving and taking on a new mortgage as you prepare for retirement or after leaving the workforce. In some cases this might be the best approach, but one debt product that should be totally off-limits involves credit cards. Credit card debt is the most expensive borrowing option on the table in almost all circumstances.

Carrying balances over from month to month can become exponentially expensive for those just trying to get by. Add to this the already challenging transition from financing your life via monthly salary checks to covering expenses from your savings portfolio, and you're looking at a stark road ahead. Carrying credit card debt into retirement is a great way to whittle away your nest egg while paying for nothing of genuine value to your life. It might be a hard pill to swallow, but it's crucially important to get rid of this kind of debt before you retire. Even if it means delaying your exit by a year or more, carrying credit card debt into retirement is a great way to find yourself running out of money in a hurry. It should be avoided at all costs.

Slowing your contributions because you're on track or ahead of your goals

One area of contention that some savers find themselves experiencing is actually a good problem to have. Sometimes, the market will be good to you and with the help of generous growth you might find yourself significantly ahead of interim goals you've set for your finances and future. It might be tempting to slow your contributions or pause them for a short period of time in order to leverage your cash flow for other necessities or even splurge opportunities. In no uncertain terms, this is a mistake. There are a number of factors working against you as you continue your voyage through the working life. For one thing, inflation is a constant enemy that can't be ignored. It averages around 2.5% annually, but all kinds of financial circumstances come together to push this figure northward on occasion. The effects of painful inflation have been on display recently, in fact. In retirement, your portfolio has to support you even through these cost of living increases. Therefore, just based on inflation alone you're almost certainly going to need more money set aside than you expect.

Beyond this constant combatant, retirees frequently have to deal with other additional expenses that weren't a part of their earlier lifestyle. As you age, the likelihood of needing expensive medical care increases. From visits to the doctor to an uptick in prescription medication requirements, your money will have to support all kinds of sudden medical requirements. The more you save the more comfortable you'll be later on in life when these surprises inevitably make their way into the picture.

Discounting the trends in life expectancy

In addition to increased medical costs coming with advanced age, it's important to realize that you're probably going to live longer than you expect. The pandemic years shortened life expectancy as the biggest two-year drop since the 1920s, but on the whole Americans are living longer than ever and this trend is only going to continue on its path into the future. As medical technology improves and other lifestyle elements come together to help support healthier living and better preventative care options, people will continue to live longer and longer.

On a practical level, this means that your money is likely going to have to support you for longer than you expect. This means that estimates you've made on how much you need to have invested by the time you retire are probably based on outdated expectations for how long you'll live. Many people will have the best of intentions when it comes to saving for retirement and put money aside diligently. However, if your calculations are based on math that doesn't add up to your ever-evolving life expectancy, you may be saving at a rate that's already too pedestrian to hit the targets you should have created for your future.

Taking early distributions from an IRA or borrowing from your 401(k)

It is actually possible to withdraw money early from your IRA and 401(k) accounts. It may not seem like something you can do when setting them up, considering all the language about taking distributions after you turn 59 ½. But early withdrawals are entirely possible, and come with some significant penalties. Aside from a few niche scenarios, taking money from an IRA account will expose you to capital gains taxes at the regular rate as well as a 10% penalty on top. When it comes to your 401(k), on the other hand, borrowing from its coffers is possible with slightly less doom and gloom involved. However, just because you can take money from these accounts doesn't mean you should. In fact, this should be an avenue of last resort if even considered at all.

The problem with taking early distributions is that you strip your portfolio of its ability to continue growing at an exponential rate. This capital is no longer working for you with the benefit of time on your side. Importantly, because these accounts have contribution caps that reset annually, it can be impossible to build your account back up to the level it started at before you tapped into its value. There's no way to earn extra money with a side hustle and deposit more into the account if you're already contributing to it at your maximum volume, for instance. These actions should only be taken in a genuine financial emergency with no other alternatives available.

Borrowing against the value of your home

The final mistake that retirees can make involves their home. The financial peculiarities of real estate are everywhere. In some cases, it can make complete sense to pay off your home as quickly as possible and become mortgage-free years ahead of the anticipated payoff schedule. Other borrowers will want to refinance their mortgage every few years to continue extracting value from their home in order to pay for other essential expenses. As is the case with many other financial situations, there is no one-size-fits-all approach for homeowners. However, generally speaking, it is not a good idea for retired homeowners to refinance their house or take out a new loan with this real estate asset as collateral. Leveraging the value of your property can be extremely useful, even in retirement. But with a fixed income and a reliance on the survival of your investment portfolio supporting your financial mobility, taking out a new and significant loan of any kind can introduce serious uncertainty and vulnerability into your life.

The problems only worsen when that vulnerability is tied to the place you call home. If your finances go wrong and you fail to meet the repayment terms, you might find yourself facing foreclosure. The threat of losing a home is huge for anyone. But for retirees, this is a much bigger issue. It might be difficult to find a new place to live that meets your physical needs in retirement, not to mention the routine and schedule that retirees often depend on.

Read the original article on Money Digest .

Senin, 21 Juli 2025

Taxes on Social Security benefits were not eliminated despite what you've heard

All the misleading hype about Social Security and tax cuts for seniors in "One Big Beautiful Bill" foreshadows one ugly scene after another at tax preparation offices next year.

It's not going to be pretty when many poorly informed retirees file 2025 tax returns. "What do you mean I'm paying taxes on my Social Security benefits?" some are sure to ask.

Already in July, I've seen social media posts from tax professionals who are dreading the day when they will have to say "welcome to reality" to their clients.

Start the day smarter. Get all the news you need in your inbox each morning.

Yes, your Social Security is still 85% taxable. "Yes, I know that's what Trump is still saying. But pay attention to what he signed, not what he says," he yelled for the 792,682,314th time into the void," posted Adam Markowitz, a Florida enrolled agent, on X.

What's sparking confusion for retirees about taxes

The White House proclaimed, once again, "NO tax on Social Security" on July 4 when President Donald Trump signed what he calls "The One Big Beautiful Bill" into law. It's not an accurate statement. He also sent a mass email on July 12 making the same point.

The Social Security Administration sent a gushy, questionable email on July 4 to millions of people receiving Social Security benefits and others. Soon after, I heard from some retirees who couldn't believe how a federal agency was doing a hard sell about the supposed benefits and creating even more confusion.

The bill ensures that nearly 90% of Social Security "Beneficiaries will no longer pay federal income taxes on their benefits, providing meaningful and immediate relief to seniors who have spent a lifetime contributing to our nation's economy," Social Security stated in its email and online.

Ninety percent, really? More on that later.

At one point, the email seemed to suggest that retirees were getting two tax breaks.

"The new law includes a provision that eliminates federal income taxes on Social Security benefits for most beneficiaries, providing relief to individuals and couples. Additionally, it provides an enhanced deduction for taxpayers aged 65 and older, ensuring that retirees can keep more of what they have earned," according to a copy of the email forwarded to me.

Additionally? There is no "additionally."

The tax cut is an enhanced deduction for taxpayers aged 65 and older. That's it. The law does not eliminate the risk that some will pay taxes on their Social Security benefits.

The Social Security blog online now refers to a correction without stating what was wrong.

Correction Notice: This blog was updated on July 7, 2025. The second sentence of the fourth paragraph originally read, 'Additionally, it provides an enhanced deduction for taxpayers aged 65 and older, ensuring that retirees can keep more of what they have earned.'

The word "additionally" is no longer in the copy.

Instead, the paragraph in the online blog at SSA.gov now reads: "The new law includes a provision that eliminates federal income taxes on Social Security benefits for most beneficiaries, providing relief to individuals and couples. It does so by providing an enhanced deduction for taxpayers aged 65 and older, ensuring that retirees can keep more of what they earned."

Clear as mud, as one of my relatives might say.

How does the "senior bonus" work?

A new, temporary "senior bonus" deduction of up to $6,000 will apply to taxpayers who are 65 and older in 2025, 2026, 2027, and 2028. It ends after that without congressional action.

Tax professionals call this a "special personal exemption" that aims to reduce the tax bill for many seniors. In general, seniors with high incomes would not qualify; lower income seniors who do not pay taxes would not benefit either.

"As a deduction and not a refundable credit, it will not help seniors who already owe no income taxes," said Mark Luscombe, principal analyst for Wolters Kluwer Tax & Accounting in Riverwoods, Illinois.

Luscombe explained that higher-income seniors receive a smaller tax break or no tax break because the deduction starts phasing out for those with a modified adjusted gross income of $75,000 for singles and $150,000 for joint filers.

And, yes, there are plenty of other rules, but, oddly enough, you do not have to be receiving Social Security benefits each month to qualify.

It will not pay to be young — no matter what your income.

Taxpayers who are 62, 63, and 64 at the end of a tax year do not qualify for the "senior bonus" deduction. They could still pay income taxes on Social Security benefits, if they are collecting benefits and meet certain income thresholds, without any offsetting bonus deduction.

Here's a breakdown of some more rules that you'll need to know when filing a 2025 return:

  • Some married couples can get a better deal: If both spouses are 65 or older, each could receive up to $6,000 or up to $12,000 total for the senior bonus deduction in a given tax year.
  • Married couples face another rule: Married couples must file jointly to claim the senior deduction. If you opt for "married filing separately," you will not qualify for the senior bonus deduction, according to Tom O'Saben, enrolled agent and director of tax content and government relations for the National Association of Tax Professionals.
  • Social Security number required: To claim the deduction, the senior must have a valid Social Security number.
  • Those with higher incomes face limits: The tax break would phase out entirely for single taxpayers 65 and older with a modified adjusted gross income of $175,000. It would phase out entirely for married taxpayers 65 and older with a modified adjusted gross income of $250,000.
  • 6% is the phase out number. When your income climbs above the threshold, the deduction phases out at a rate of 6%.

The National Association of Tax Professionals, which has 23,000 members, provided an example for a 70-year-old retiree who is single and has a modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) of $90,000.

In this example, $15,000 of MAGI exceeds the $75,000 threshold for a single tax filer.

Take out your calculator and multiply $15,000 by 6% to hit $900.

The maximum $6,000 senior bonus deduction is then reduced by $900 in this example to reach a senior deduction of $5,100.

Taxes on Social Security were never eliminated

Believe me, you're not doing your friends any favors now by insisting that there are no taxes on Social Security benefits. Some people still need to withhold taxes on their Social Security benefits, if they have other significant sources of income.

At no point did the House bill or Senate version, which was later passed by the House and signed into law by Trump, ever include a provision to eliminate the tax on Social Security or provide a deduction for Social Security income, according to a summary of the massive reconciliation bill provided by Wolters Kluwer, an information services company.

Trump famously proposed making Social Security income tax-free during his 2024 campaign. But such a change could not be part of the budget reconciliation process. One provision of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 prohibits Senate reconciliation bills from including any measure that changes Social Security benefits or taxes.

"It's fair to frame this new deduction as an attempt to fulfill the spirit of the president's campaign proposal consistent with the limits imposed in the reconciliation process," said Garrett Watson, director of policy analysis at the nonpartisan Tax Foundation.

"But selling this politically as exempting Social Security from income tax is not accurate and will confuse or upset the seniors who end up paying tax on some benefits," Watson said.

The senior bonus deduction, Watson points out, applies to any source of taxable income that a taxpayer who is 65 or older has and may not necessarily eliminate all tax on Social Security benefits.

Social Security benefits began being taxed at the federal level in 1984 to strengthen the Social Security trust fund, which was facing insolvency.

At best, the new tax break means many seniors will save some money on taxes over four years.

"Despite the SSA claims, most would see their income taxes on Social Security benefits reduced, not eliminated," wrote Howard Gleckman, a senior fellow at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center.

In an online report on July 9, Gleckman wrote that the biggest beneficiaries Seniors making between about $80,000 and $130,000. The senior bonus deduction would amount to an average tax cut of about $1,100 or roughly 1% of their after-tax income, he said.

The tax deduction of up to $6,000 would benefit fewer than half of older adults, according to estimates from the Tax Policy Center.

How much a senior who qualifies for the "senior bonus" will save on taxes depends on their taxable income, which determines their marginal tax rate.

For example, at a 12% marginal tax rate, the $6,000 deduction for a single taxpayer who is 65 or older would result in $720 in tax savings, according to Watson.

For a single taxpayer, the 12% tax rate applies to taxable income from $11,926 to $48,475 in 2025. Annual inflation adjustments can be made to marginal tax brackets.

Hype, complexities and more can get your head spinning

All this begs the question: How can Trump say there will be no taxes on Social Security benefits?

Well, retirees will have to treat this one as one of those Trumpisms where, perhaps, you need to read the fine print first.

"The president often seems to try to put as positive a spin as possible on an issue without being totally consistent with the facts," Luscombe said.

The 90% number used in the email sent by the Social Security Administration appears to track a 90% figure used by the White House. It is misleading.

Many people did not have to pay taxes on Social Security benefits based on their income before the mega tax bill was signed into law on July 4.

About 40% of people Who currently receive Social Security pay income taxes on their benefits, according to an earlier report issued by the Social Security Administration in 2025.

Other estimates, though, suggest that a bit more than 50% currently pay taxes.

The Tax Foundation did not estimate the portion of seniors who would not pay tax on benefits under the new deduction. However, it noted that roughly half of all Social Security beneficiaries did not pay federal income tax on their Social Security benefits before the new tax law.

Gleckman, at the Tax Policy Center, told the Detroit Free Press — part of the USA TODAY Network — that the 90% figure used by the Social Security Administration is not close to reality. In his online blog, Gleckman said the administration apparently arrived at its 90% estimate by "assuming all tax deductions, including the new senior deduction, are used only to reduce Social Security benefit taxes."

"But, of course, older adults pay taxes on all their taxable income, including from sources other than Social Security," Gleckman wrote.

The Tax Policy Center's estimate is that about half of all recipients will pay at least some income taxes on their Social Security benefits, Gleckman wrote. "That is, they face higher tax liability than they would if benefits were not taxable."

"The Social Security system is complicated, and in many ways, its complexity is terrifying for older adults, many of whom rely on its benefits to pay living expenses in old age. The latest SSA communication does not help and indeed may make matters worse," Gleckman wrote.

How Social Security benefits are taxed will remain a complex headache for many people aged 62 and older.

Based on Social Security data, nearly 23% of men and 24.5% of women who claimed retirement benefits in 2022 were age 62.

The earliest age that you can claim Social Security retirement benefits is 62. By collecting as early as possible, though, you'd receive a reduced monthly retirement benefit that is cut by a small percentage for each month before your full retirement age.

The full retirement age is 67 Now for those born in 1960 and later. For those born earlier, the full retirement age varies and is less than 67 depending on when you were born.

How Social Security benefits are taxed

Unfortunately, it doesn't take much extra income to get hit with some taxes because income thresholds that trigger the tax on Social Security benefits do not adjust for inflation.

For single filers, the threshold for paying taxes on up to 50% of Social Security benefits applies when your combined income is between $25,000 and $34,000 a year. Once the combined income is higher, up to 85% of benefits may be taxable.

Couples filing a joint return face taxes on up to 50% of their Social Security benefits if their combined income is between $32,000 and $44,000. If the couple's combined income is higher than that, up to 85% of benefits would be taxable.

Combined income is your adjusted gross income, plus nontaxable interest, such as interest on certain bonds, plus half of your Social Security benefits received that year.

As a result, someone who is working while collecting Social Security benefits would need to take their earnings from a job into account. The same is true for someone who is retired and taking taxable withdrawals from traditional 401(k) plans.

All that tax complexity isn't going to disappear.

O'Saben, from the National Association of Tax Professionals, said he is frustrated by how the senior bonus deduction is being marketed. He heard a news story on the radio that implied that Social Security benefits were no longer taxable, and he found himself yelling at the radio while driving.

"There is no provision making Social Security benefits tax free," O'Saben said.

Contact personal finance columnist Susan Tompor: stompor@freepress.com . Follow he r on X @tompor.

This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: Taxes on Social Security benefits were not eliminated despite what you've heard

Minggu, 22 Desember 2024

Here's the Average Social Security Benefit at Ages 62, 67, and 70

For more than eight decades, Social Security has been providing a monthly benefit to retired workers. While this payment is not making any of the program's beneficiaries rich, it has proven to be a necessity, more often than not, for retirees.

In each of the last 23 years, Gallup has conducted a survey to gauge how reliant retired workers are on the income they receive from Social Security . These polls have found that 80% to 90% of retirees rely on their monthly check, in some capacity, to cover their expenses.

Start Your Mornings Smarter! Wake up with Breakfast news in your inbox every market day. Sign Up For Free »

A separate analysis from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities found that the poverty rate for adults aged 65 and above would be nearly four times higher if Social Security didn't exist -- 10.2% (as of 2022) with Social Security versus an estimated 38.7% without.

Therefore, getting as much as possible out of Social Security is vital to the financial well-being of most future retirees.

But in order to maximize what you'll receive from Social Security, you'll first need to understand how your benefit is calculated. Only then can you realize how important your claimed age is , and what impact an early (age 62), middle-ground (age 67), or late (age 70) collection approach can have on your monthly benefit.

These four components are used to calculate your monthly Social Security check

Although Social Security sometimes has surprises in store for its recipients -- did you know Social Security benefits can be taxable at the federal level, as well as in nine states ? -- the four factors used by the Social Security Administration (SSA) to calculate your monthly check are straightforward:

  1. Work history
  2. Earnings history
  3. Full retirement age
  4. Claiming age

Your work and earnings history are two components that are intertwined. The SSA will take into account your 35 highest-earning, inflation-adjusted years when calculating your monthly benefit. If you earn a higher average wage or salary throughout your lifetime (investment income doesn't count), you're more likely to receive a larger monthly benefit during retirement.

But regardless of how much you earn each year, you'll be penalized if you don't have at least 35 years of work history. For every year less than 35 worked, the SSA will average a $0 into your calculation. If you believe you'll need your Social Security check to make ends meet during retirement, you'll want to work at least 35 years.

The third variable, your full retirement age, is determined by the year you were born . It represents the age you become eligible to receive 100% of your retired-worker benefit, and it's the only component we can't control.

Last, but certainly not least, Your claimed age can wildly swing the monthly (and lifetime) payout pendulum . Even though retired-worker benefits can begin as early as age 62, there is a financial incentive that encourages patience. More specifically, for every year a worker waits to collect their benefit, beginning at age 62 and continuing until age 70, their payout can grow by up to 8%. You can see how this plays out, depending on your full retirement age, in the table.

Birth Year Age 62 Age 63 Age 64 Age 65 Age 66 Age 67 Age 68 Age 69 Age 70
1943-1954 75% 80% 86.7% 93.3% 100% 108% 116% 124% 132%
1955 74.2% 79.2% 85.6% 92.2% 98.9% 106.7% 114.7% 122.7% 130.7%
1956 73.3% 78.3% 84.4% 91.1% 97.8% 105.3% 113.3% 121.3% 129.3%
1957 72.5% 77.5% 83.3% 90% 96.7% 104% 112% 120% 128%
1958 71.7% 76.7% 82.2% 88.9% 95.6% 102.7% 110.7% 118.7% 126.7%
1959 70.8% 75.8% 81.1% 87.8% 94.4% 101.3% 109.3% 117.3% 125.3%
1960 or later 70% 75% 80% 86.7% 93.3% 100% 108% 116% 124%

Data source: Social Security Administration.

What is the average Social Security benefit at ages 62, 67, and 70?

Although every age within the traditional collection range of 62 through 70 has its own unique advantages and drawbacks, Three claiming ages are likely to be especially popular moving forward. : 62, 67, and 70.

Let's briefly examine the pros and cons of these three claiming ages and take a closer look at what the average beneficiary is respectively taking home each month at 62, 67, and 70.

  • Why collect at age 62? The lure of claiming benefits at age 62 is not having to wait to get your hands on your benefit. There's also the possibility of sweeping Social Security benefit cuts by 2033 . Taking your payout as soon as possible may be viewed as a way to front-run any possible reduction.

    On the other hand, your payout is permanently reduced by 25% to 30% when collecting at age 62 (depending on your birth year). Additionally, you may be exposed to other early-filer penalties, such as the retirement earnings test , which allows the SSA to withhold some or all of your benefits, depending on your income.

  • Why collect at age 67? This could quickly become the most popular of all claiming ages, given that age 67 is the full retirement age for anyone born in or after 1960 (i.e., most of today's workforce). Initially collecting at 67 means no reduction to your monthly payout. The downside to claiming at 67 is that if you live well into your 80s (or beyond), you'll have, in hindsight, left a lot of Social Security income on the table.
  • Why collect at age 70? The advantage of a claim at age 70 is that you're guaranteed to maximize your monthly benefit, which will be between 24% and 32% more than what you would have received at your full retirement age (depending on your birth year). On the flip side, there's no guarantee you'll live long enough to also maximize your lifetime payout from Social Security.

With a better understanding of the positives and drawbacks of these three claiming ages, let's examine what the average Social Security benefit is at 62, 67, and 70.

Every year, the SSA's Office of the Actuary releases a breakdown detailing the average monthly benefit of retired-worker beneficiaries between ages 62 and 99-plus . Keep in mind this data is based on the age of retired workers, as of December 2023, and is not necessarily indicative of the age they began collecting their benefit, except for age 62.

With this being said, approximately 590,000 aged 62 retired-worker beneficiaries received an average check of $1,298.26 in December 2023. By comparison, nearly 2.92 million retirees took home an average payout of $1,883.50 at age 67 . Lastly, approximately 3.01 million retired-worker beneficiaries pocketed an average benefit of $2,037.54 at age 70 .

From one end of the traditional claiming spectrum to the other, age 70 beneficiaries received, on average, 57% more than the earliest filers.

Statistically speaking, there is a superior claiming age for most retirees

Due to this wide variation in monthly payments, you might be wondering if one or more ages within the traditional retirement range gives future retirees a better chance of maximizing what they will receive from Social Security. According to a comprehensive statistical analysis, there is.

In 2019, researchers at United Income released a study, The Retirement Solution Hiding in Plain Sight , which extrapolated the claim decisions of 20,000 retired workers using data from the University of Michigan's Health and Retirement Study. The goal was to see which, if any, ages were responsible for optimizing Social Security benefits. In this sense, an "optimal" payout is one that maximizes lifetime (key word!) income collection.

As you might expect, this extensive analysis found that just 4% of the 20,000 retired workers studied had made an optimal claim. Since we don't know our "expiration date" ahead of time, there's always going to be some degree of guesswork involved when making our claim decision.

To add, we all have our own unique path we walk toward retirement. Everyone's combination of financial needs, accessible retirement accounts, marital status, tax implications, personal health, and so on, will differ. Without a one-size-fits-all blueprint, it will lead to some variability in claiming choice.

However, the more important finding is the nearly perfect inversion between actual and optimal claims. Although 79% of the 20,000 retired workers began receiving their benefits from ages 62 through 64, only 8% of claims made in this range ultimately proved optimal .

On the other hand, while only a small percentage of retired workers waited until age 70 to begin receiving their Social Security benefit, this would have been optimal for an astounding 57% of the 20,000 retired workers analyzed .

To be fair, this doesn't mean all future retirees should wait until age 70 to begin collecting their payout. For instance, people with one or more chronic health conditions that can shorten their lifespan may have very good reason for collecting at an earlier age.

But based on this extensive statistical analysis, patience is likely to pay off handsomely for a majority of future retirees. It's something to keep in mind if you expect to rely on Social Security, in any capacity, to make ends meet during retirement.

The $ 22,924 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook

If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets" could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. For example: one easy trick could pay you as much as $ 22,924 more... every year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we all seek. Simply click here to find out how to learn more about these strategies.

View the "Social Security secrets" »

The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy .